Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-02-02 10:36:30
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:13 AM Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allnoconfig) failed like this:
In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:76,
from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:12,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:56,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7,
from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
from include/linux/gfp.h:6,
from include/linux/slab.h:15,
from include/linux/crypto.h:20,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
include/linux/mm.h: In function 'is_pinnable_page':
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_to_section'; did you mean 'present_section'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
64 | int __sec = page_to_section(__pg); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:81:21: note: in expansion of macro '__page_to_pfn'
81 | #define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/mm.h:1134:15: note: in expansion of macro 'page_to_pfn'
1134 | is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In addition, noreply@ellerman.id.au reports for m68k/m5272c3_defconfig:
include/linux/mm.h:1133:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'is_zero_pfn'; did you mean 'is_zero_ino'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
is_zero_pfn() is only defined if CONFIG_MMU=y.
Hence using it in mm/gup.c in commit 3f509f6aef4bb868 ("mm/gup: migrate
pinned pages out of movable zone") breaks compilation of gup.c, too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds