Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2020-03-02

Re: [RFC v1 1/2] mm/gup: fixup for 9947ea2c1e608e32 "mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages"

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: 2020-02-28 23:08:40
Also in: linux-mm, linux-s390, lkml

On 2/28/20 7:43 AM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In case pin fails, we need to unpin, a simple put_page will not be enough

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
---
 mm/gup.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index f589299b0d4a..0b9a806898f3 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -2134,7 +2134,10 @@ static int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			goto pte_unmap;
 
 		if (unlikely(pte_val(pte) != pte_val(*ptep))) {
-			put_page(head);
+			if (flags & FOLL_GET)
+				put_page(head);
+			else if (flags & FOLL_PIN)
+				unpin_user_page(head);
Hi Claudio,

Instead, I think that should actually be:

		put_compound_head(page, 1, flags);

which does a bit more (bug checks and /proc/vmstat instrumentation) than your diff,
but has the same basic idea: call the right "put" function.  

...oh, actually, I see you have the commit hash in the subject line. Instead, it should 
be in the commit description. Let's maybe change the subject line to approx:

    mm/gup: Fix a missing put_compound_head() call in gup_pte_range()

And the write up...how about something like this, if you like it:


try_grab_compound_head() must be undone via put_compound_head(), not put_page().
This was missed in the original implementation of the gup/dma tracking patch, so
fix it now.

Fixes: 0ea2781c3de4 ("mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages")


    
(Aside: I'm using the linux-next commit hash. How does one get the correct hash before
it goes to mainline? I guess maintainer scripts fix all those up?)

It's also good to Cc some reviewers in case I'm overlooking something, so I'm adding
Jan and Kirill.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
 			goto pte_unmap;
 		}
 
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help