Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14

----- Original Message -----

On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 14:01, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Hi all,
Changes since 20191113:
The y2038 tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.

<trim>

quoted

The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the y2038 tree.

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10388
 9238 files changed, 397357 insertions(+), 174171 deletions(-)

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions detected on x86_64, and i386.

LTP syscalls settimeofday01/02 failed on x86_64 and i386 running
5.4.0-rc7-next-20191114.

Following  ltp-syscalls-tests failed.
    * settimeofday01
    * settimeofday02
    * stime01
    * stime02

Looks like typo in
adde74306a4b ("y2038: time: avoid timespec usage in settimeofday()")

-               if (!timeval_valid(&user_tv))
+               if (tv->tv_usec > USEC_PER_SEC)

was likely meant as:

-               if (!timeval_valid(&user_tv))
+               if (new_ts.tv_nsec > USEC_PER_SEC)

since tv is user pointer.