Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2018-11-30

Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree

From: Kalle Valo <hidden>
Date: 2018-11-30 04:34:13
Also in: linux-wireless, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] writes:
Hi all,

After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64 allmodconfig) produced these warnings:

drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c: In function 'iwl_parse_tlv_firmware':
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c:1098:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    if (iwlwifi_mod_params.enable_ini)
       ^
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.c:1100:3: note: here
   default:
   ^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-dbg-tlv.c: In function 'iwl_parse_fw_dbg_tlv':
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-dbg-tlv.c:203:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    iwl_fw_dbg_copy_tlv(trans, tlv, true);
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-dbg-tlv.c:204:3: note: here
   default:
   ^~~~~~~

Introduced by commit

  f14cda6f3b31 ("iwlwifi: trans: parse and store debug ini TLVs")

These are noted because I use -Wimplict-fallthrough

The warnings can be suppressed by adding a comment like
	/* fall through */
at the appropriate place to indicate that the fallthough is intended.
I take it that -Wimplict-fallthrough is not enabled by default yet? So
Dave and Linus won't see these warnings?

What I'm planning is to send a pull request to Dave today and fix these
warnings in the next pull request. Does that sound good?

-- 
Kalle Valo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help