Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2018-08-15

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the rdma tree

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2018-08-15 19:26:21
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 11:45:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:58:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c

between commit:

  23f96d1f15a7 ("nvmet-rdma: Simplify ib_post_(send|recv|srq_recv)() calls")
  202093848cac ("nvmet-rdma: add an error flow for post_recv failures")

from the rdma tree and commits:

  2fc464e2162c ("nvmet-rdma: add unlikely check in the fast path")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between Linus' tree and the rdma tree.
Yes, I expect this.. good thing we had linux-next as several of these
needed non-obvious changes.

I keep track of your postings and build a conflict resolution for
Linus to refer to. netdev is the last conflicting tree I expect, and
it hasn't been sent yet..

Thanks,
Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help