Hi Chao,

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 17:09:13 +0800 Chao Yu [off-list ref] wrote:

Xiang has submitted several patches as below to fix compiling error on -next
tree, could you consider to merge those temporary fixes into -next after merging
staging-next's updates, and reenable CONFIG_EROFS_FS for further integrity
compiling and test?

staging: erofs: fix superblock/inode flags (MS_RDONLY -> SB_RDONLY, S_NOATIME)
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000282.html

staging: erofs: remove RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_{ENTRY, SHIFT}
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000283.html

staging: erofs: update .mount and .remount_sb
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linux-erofs/2018-July/000285.html

OK, I will apply those tomorrow (actually later today :-)) and and stop
disabling CONFIG_EROFS_FS.

BTW, for this condition that erofs was not covered by some common vfs
stuff changes in other one's tree, who should take care of those
missing fixes during coming next merge window?

It might be easiest for Greg to add the disabling CONFIG_EROFS_FS patch
to the staging tree itself for his first pull request during the merge
window and then send a second pull request (after the vfs and maybe the
Xarray stuff has been merged by Linus) with these patches followed by a
revert of the disabling patch.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell