Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-17 03:53:36
Also in:
lkml
Hi all, On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 09:44:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:43:08 +0100 Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon 13-11-17 16:42:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:quoted
After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning: In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0, from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10, from mm/mempolicy.c:70: mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'mpol_to_str': include/linux/nodemask.h:107:41: warning: the address of 'nodes' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Waddress] #define nodemask_pr_args(maskp) (maskp) ? MAX_NUMNODES : 0, (maskp) ? (maskp)->bits : NULL ^ mm/mempolicy.c:2817:11: note: in expansion of macro 'nodemask_pr_args' nodemask_pr_args(&nodes)); ^Hmm, this warning is quite surprising to me. Sure in this particular case maskp will always be non-NULL so we always expand to MAX_NUMNODES, maskp->bits which is what we want. But we have other users which may be NULL. Does anybody understan why this warns at all?As I understand it, the warning tries to address a common typo of accidentally testing the pointer to a stack object for being non-NULL, rather than the object pointed to for being non-zero. Adding an extra '!= NULL' comparison gets rid of the warning for me: #define nodemask_pr_args(maskp) \ ((maskp) != NULL) ? MAX_NUMNODES : 0, \ ((maskp) != NULL) ?(maskp)->bits : NULL ArndThis warning now exists in Linus' tree :-(
Looking closer, it seems that the above workaround doesn't work for my
compiler (gcc v5.2.0):
In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:17:0,
from include/linux/mempolicy.h:10,
from mm/mempolicy.c:70:
mm/mempolicy.c: In function 'mpol_to_str':
include/linux/nodemask.h:108:11: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'nodes' will never be NULL [-Waddress]
((maskp) != NULL) ? MAX_NUMNODES : 0, \
^
mm/mempolicy.c:2817:11: note: in expansion of macro 'nodemask_pr_args'
nodemask_pr_args(&nodes));
^
include/linux/nodemask.h:109:11: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'nodes' will never be NULL [-Waddress]
((maskp) != NULL) ? (maskp)->bits : NULL
^
mm/mempolicy.c:2817:11: note: in expansion of macro 'nodemask_pr_args'
nodemask_pr_args(&nodes));
^
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell