Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2017-09-05

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the staging tree

From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-28 06:49:18
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 04:41:27PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi James,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/staging/unisys/visorhba/visorhba_main.c

between commits:

  781facd05eb9 ("staging: unisys: visorhba: visorhba_main.c: fixed comment formatting issues")

from the staging tree and commit:

  7bc4e528d9f6 ("scsi: visorhba: sanitze private device data allocation")

from the scsi tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
Ick, messy merge, thanks for doing this.

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help