Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
From: Paul E. McKenney <hidden>
Date: 2017-08-01 21:37:00
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 07:15:40AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
/* * The full memory barrier implied by mm_cpumask update operations * is required by the membarrier system call. */ What we want to order here is: prev userspace memory accesses schedule <full mb> (it's already there) [A] update to rq->curr changing the rq->curr->mm value <full mb> (provided by mm_cpumask updates in switch_mm on x86) [B]If I understand this right, the issue with relying on CR3 writes is that the target CPU could switch to a kernel thread and back to the same user mm white the membarrier caller is reading its mm, right?
The thing that got my attention was your patch removing the load_cr3(). Ah, looking closer, it appears that you have not eliminated the CR3 load, but just renamed it to write_cr3(). So if there is always still a CR3 load, you are right, I should be able to simply move the comment. Or let you insert the comment into your patch? So there is still always a CR3 load, correct? (Hey, I thought that maybe x86 was moving to ASIDs or some such.) Thanx, Paul