Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
From: Daniel Vetter <hidden>
Date: 2017-07-21 07:24:52
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml
Hi Greg&Hans, How are we going to handle this now? The refactor is deeply burried in drm-misc, I guess you could cherry-pick the relevant patches over. But that'll probably lead to more conflicts because git will get confused. Or you could just delete the set_busid hook in -staging, which renders the driver unbisectable since it'll only work when merged together with the drm trees. This is pretty much why I don't like -staging, it makes cross subsystem refactorings (which is already hard, getting 20+ driver folks to agree on stuff sometimes) unecessarily harder. Cheers, Daniel On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Dave, The following is now applicable to the drm and staging.current trees ... On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:46:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:235:2: error: unknown field 'set_busid' specified in initializer .set_busid = drm_pci_set_busid, ^ drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:235:15: error: 'drm_pci_set_busid' undeclared here (not in a function) .set_busid = drm_pci_set_busid, ^ drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c: In function 'vbox_init': drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:273:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_pci_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] return drm_pci_init(&driver, &vbox_pci_driver); ^ drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c: In function 'vbox_exit': drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c:278:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_pci_exit' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drm_pci_exit(&driver, &vbox_pci_driver); ^ Caused by commits 5c484cee7ef9 ("drm: Remove drm_driver->set_busid hook") 10631d724def ("drm/pci: Deprecate drm_pci_init/exit completely") interacting with commit dd55d44f4084 ("staging: vboxvideo: Add vboxvideo to drivers/staging") from the staging.current tree. I have applied the following merge fix patch - please check that it is correct. From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:41:01 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] drm: fixes for staging due to API changes in the drm core Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted> --- drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c index 92ae1560a16d..6d0600c37c0c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c +++ b/drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = { .lastclose = vbox_driver_lastclose, .master_set = vbox_master_set, .master_drop = vbox_master_drop, - .set_busid = drm_pci_set_busid, .fops = &vbox_fops, .irq_handler = vbox_irq_handler,@@ -270,12 +269,12 @@ static int __init vbox_init(void) if (vbox_modeset == 0) return -EINVAL; - return drm_pci_init(&driver, &vbox_pci_driver); + return pci_register_driver(&vbox_pci_driver); } static void __exit vbox_exit(void) { - drm_pci_exit(&driver, &vbox_pci_driver); + pci_unregister_driver(&vbox_pci_driver); } module_init(vbox_init); --2.13.2-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx