Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the file-locks tree
From: Jeff Layton <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-28 09:54:09
Also in:
lkml
From: Jeff Layton <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-28 09:54:09
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 20:01 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/27/2017 07:57 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:quoted
Hi Jens, Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in: include/linux/fs.h between commit: 3f64df8a51ce ("fs: new infrastructure for writeback error handling and reporting") from the file-locks tree and commit: c75b1d9421f8 ("fs: add fcntl() interface for setting/getting write life time hints") from the block tree.Looks like we stole the same hole! Let's just merge it like this, then post merge I (or Jeff) can move the member to a better location.
(cc'ing Al since he might pick these up...) Indeed! I'll plan to move f_wb_err to the end of the struct. I have some later patches that add a second 32-bit errseq_t field to struct file for tracking metadata writeback errors. That would make them adjacent to one another which at least looks a little cleaner. Cheers, -- Jeff Layton [off-list ref]