Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-28

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the file-locks tree

From: Jeff Layton <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-28 09:54:09
Also in: lkml

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 20:01 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/27/2017 07:57 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/fs.h

between commit:

  3f64df8a51ce ("fs: new infrastructure for writeback error handling and reporting")

from the file-locks tree and commit:

  c75b1d9421f8 ("fs: add fcntl() interface for setting/getting write life time hints")

from the block tree.
Looks like we stole the same hole! Let's just merge it like this, then
post merge I (or Jeff) can move the member to a better location.
(cc'ing Al since he might pick these up...)

Indeed!

I'll plan to move f_wb_err to the end of the struct.

I have some later patches that add a second 32-bit errseq_t field to
struct file for tracking metadata writeback errors. That would make them
adjacent to one another which at least looks a little cleaner.

Cheers,
-- 
Jeff Layton [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help