Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the vfs-miklos tree
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-28 06:25:07
Also in:
lkml
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2016-09-28 06:25:07
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:00:22PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Greg,
Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c
between commit:
302d50e7203e ("switch generic_file_splice_read() to use of ->read_iter()")
from the vfs-miklos tree and commits:
5b8a39c53a16 ("staging: lustre: llite: Replace write mutex with range lock")
ee5532436a7d ("staging: lustre: lov: remove LL_IOC_RECREATE_{FID, OBJ}")
from the staging tree.
I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.Looks good to me, one of these days we will get lustre out of staging to make this easier... thanks, greg k-h