Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-07-15 15:29:53
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2016-07-15 15:29:53
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:24:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Seems ok, but I'll reinstate this: #if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h #endif
Confuses me; why do we have two? Why not then do: #define BITS_PER_LONG __BITS_PER_LONG and be done with it?