Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-03-01

Re: linux-next: Unable to write into a vma if it has been mapped without PROT_READ

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-03-01 01:00:57
Also in: linux-mm

On 02/29/2016 12:15 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:11:37AM -0800, Andrey Wagin wrote:
quoted
quoted
Hello Everyone,

I found that now we can't write into a vma if it was mapped without PROT_READ:

mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f2ac7eb8000
--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_ACCERR, si_addr=0x7f2ac7eb8000} ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++
Segmentation fault
[root@linux-next-test ~]# cat test.c
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

int main()
{
    int *p;

    p = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
    p[0] = 1;

    return 0;
}

[root@linux-next-test ~]# uname -a
Linux linux-next-test 4.5.0-rc6-next-20160229 #1 SMP Mon Feb 29
17:38:25 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

This issue appeared in 4.5.0-rc5-next-20160226.

https://ci.openvz.org/job/CRIU-linux-next/152/console
Looks like the regression is caused by change in access_error() by commit
62b5f7d013fc ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support")
as per next-20160229.

		/*
		 * Assume all accesses require either read or execute
		 * permissions.  This is not an instruction access, so
		 * it requires read permissions.
		 */
		if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ))
			return 1;

The assumption is false, taking this testcase into account.
I'm taking a look at it.  I might just be able to remove that check, but
I need to do a little due diligence with the execute-only support and
make sure I'm not breaking it.

Thanks for reporting this, btw!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help