Re: linux-next: Unable to write into a vma if it has been mapped without PROT_READ
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2016-03-01 01:00:57
Also in:
linux-mm
On 02/29/2016 12:15 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:11:37AM -0800, Andrey Wagin wrote:quoted
quoted
Hello Everyone, I found that now we can't write into a vma if it was mapped without PROT_READ: mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f2ac7eb8000--- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_ACCERR, si_addr=0x7f2ac7eb8000} --- +++ killed by SIGSEGV (core dumped) +++Segmentation fault [root@linux-next-test ~]# cat test.c #include <sys/mman.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int *p; p = mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); p[0] = 1; return 0; } [root@linux-next-test ~]# uname -a Linux linux-next-test 4.5.0-rc6-next-20160229 #1 SMP Mon Feb 29 17:38:25 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This issue appeared in 4.5.0-rc5-next-20160226. https://ci.openvz.org/job/CRIU-linux-next/152/consoleLooks like the regression is caused by change in access_error() by commit 62b5f7d013fc ("mm/core, x86/mm/pkeys: Add execute-only protection keys support") as per next-20160229. /* * Assume all accesses require either read or execute * permissions. This is not an instruction access, so * it requires read permissions. */ if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)) return 1; The assumption is false, taking this testcase into account.
I'm taking a look at it. I might just be able to remove that check, but I need to do a little due diligence with the execute-only support and make sure I'm not breaking it. Thanks for reporting this, btw! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>