Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree
From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-06 16:25:19
Also in:
lkml
From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2016-01-06 16:25:19
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:01:14AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order.
The order makes no difference. The problem is that we had conflicting patches: I still had Christoph's patch, but Doug's tree did something different. (The only reason to care about merge order is that if I sent my pull request to Linus first, it would look like "here's the nfsd changes for 4.5. Oh, plus a bunch of rdma changes from Doug which he can explain later...". So it'd be best if the rdma changes were already in before I sent a pull request based on them.)
I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by?
Sure, I'm fine with doing it either way. Feel free to add my Acked-by: to the patches you sent me before if that would simplify things. --b.