Re: crisv32 runtime failure in -next due to 'page-flags: define behavior SL*B-related flags on compound pages'
From: Kirill A. Shutemov <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-22 12:03:49
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:17:34PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/21/2015 08:34 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:quoted
Guenter Roeck wrote:quoted
On 09/18/2015 07:53 AM, Jesper Nilsson wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:29:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:quoted
Hi, my crisv32 qemu test fails with next-20150917 as follows. NET: Registered protocol family 16 kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1648! Linux 4.3.0-rc1-next-20150917 #1 Wed Sep 16 23:56:59 PDT 2015 Oops: 0000 [ register dump follows ] See http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders/qemu-crisv32-next/builds/83/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio for a complete log.Is there a chance to get proper backtrace?Yes, it should be possible with CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y in the kconfig.Good to know. I added it to my configuration. Here it is: kernel BUG at mm/slab.c:1648!I still don't understand what's going on :( Could you try with this instrumentation:diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index ce9c6531e6f7..10035d1a06d3 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c@@ -1645,7 +1645,11 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct page *page) sub_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, nr_freed); - BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page)); + if (!PageSlab(page)) { + dump_page(page, "page"); + dump_page(compound_head(page), "compound_head(page)"); + BUG(); + } __ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page); __ClearPageSlab(page); page_mapcount_reset(page);page:c04a5340 count:1 mapcount:1 mapping:c1f34080 index:0xc1f34060 flags: 0x80(slab) page dumped because: page page:c1f17a04 count:0 mapcount:1 mapping:00d13600 index:0xc0 flags: 0x0() page dumped because: compound_head(page) Does that help ?
Kinda. It's false positive PageTail() due low bit set in page->rcu_head.next. It happens (at least) due broken alignment of 'rcu' field within task_struct -- offsetof(struct task_struct, rcu): 773. That's looks veery broken. I would guess compiler does something horribly wrong. I hope it's not an ABI issue. :-/ Mikael? Jesper? -- Kirill A. Shutemov