Re: [PATCH] Documentation/vDSO: don't build tests when cross compiling
From: Paul Gortmaker <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-22 19:09:54
Also in:
lkml
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation/vDSO: don't build tests when cross compiling] On 22/06/2015 (Mon 10:01) Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Jonathan Corbet [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:10:28 -0400 Paul Gortmaker [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The following was seen in linux-next build coverage, which is somewhat unique since it uses powerpc host to cross compile x86: Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.c:49:2: error: impossible register constraint in 'asm' make[4]: *** [Documentation/vDSO/vdso_standalone_test_x86.o] Error 1 It probably makes sense to just skip building these tests when we are cross compiling.So I guess I'm not totally averse to applying these; getting rid of build errors is a good thing. But I do get the feeling like it's papering over the real problem. As a general rule, cross-compiling works; what's special about these programs that makes it fail?Agreed. What gcc version is this?
Just to re-iterate, this is ppc host, cross compiling x86_64 target. The linux-next build I saw the errors in this weekend is here: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12445538/ According to that, it is gcc 4.6.3 It seems that the assumption is that nobody cross compiles x86, so when people see CONFIG_X86_64 set, they assume HOSTCC can create x86 binaries and will do so by default. Hence the breakdown in creation of some of these sample programs. We've already a similar fix in mainline in e9107f88c985bc ("samples/seccomp/Makefile: do not build tests if cross-compiling for MIPS") I've added linux-next folks to Cc: -- probably should have done that on the original send... they know more about the toolchains used for -next. Paul. --
--Andyquoted
Thanks, jon-- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC