Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 20
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Date: 2015-01-20 14:17:52
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:53:08PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all, Changes since 20150119: The omap tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree. The net-next tree lost its build failure. The mmc-uh tree gained a conflict against the sunxi tree. The audit tree gained conflicts against Linus' tree. Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3975 3828 files changed, 141642 insertions(+), 68217 deletions(-)
What difference a few days can make ... from zero failures to: Build results: total: 133 pass: 123 fail: 10 Failed builds: i386:allyesconfig mips:allmodconfig powerpc:cell_defconfig (binutils 2.23) powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig powerpc:cell_defconfig (binutils 2.24) powerpc:mpc85xx_defconfig powerpc:mpc85xx_smp_defconfig sparc64:allmodconfig x86_64:allyesconfig Qemu tests: total: 30 pass: 19 fail: 11 Failed tests: microblaze:microblaze_defconfig microblaze:microblazeel_defconfig mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig powerpc:ppc_book3s_smp_defconfig powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig sh:sh_defconfig sparc32:sparc_defconfig sparc32:sparc_smp_defconfig x86:x86_pc_defconfig x86_64:x86_64_pc_defconfig Most of it mm related problems inherited from mmotm, but there are a few others (sparc64, x86_64, and i386 don't fail to build on mmotm, and the microblaze qemu test fails differently, for example). Guenter