Re: [PATCH] ftrace: don't allow IPMODIFY without proper compiler support (was Re: Re: livepatching tree for linux-next)
From: Jiri Kosina <hidden>
Date: 2015-01-14 08:34:36
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h index f45acad..29fa417 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h@@ -4,8 +4,10 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER #ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY # define MCOUNT_ADDR ((long)(__fentry__)) +# define arch_ftrace_ipmodify_compiler_support(void) ({ 1; }) #else # define MCOUNT_ADDR ((long)(mcount)) +#define arch_ftrace_ipmodify_compiler_support(void) ({ 0; })Hmm, can we just define ARCH_FTRACE_SUPPORT_IPMODIFY here?
Yup, that's more or less what Steven suggested as well. I'll send v2.
quoted
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c index 929a733..11370fd 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c@@ -1809,6 +1809,11 @@ static int __ftrace_hash_update_ipmodify(struct ftrace_ops *ops, if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY)) return 0; + if (!arch_ftrace_ipmodify_compiler_support()) { + WARN(1, "Your compiler doesn't support features necessary for IPMODIFY"); + return 0; + }Actually, if ftrace doesn't support IPMODIFY, I would like to just drop the entire code for CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE(this is a hidden config), instead of checking at runtime. So, there are 2 ifdefs of code in kernel/kprobes.c for CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE, those should also check ARCH_FTRACE_SUPPORT_IPMODIFY too.
Makes sense. Will send that as a followup patch once the way how to do this in ftrace is settled. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs