Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-06-24 11:43:39
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/18/14 23:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:quoted
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual. Changes since 20140618:on i386: CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled. CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_freeze': ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_target_system_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: error: 'ACPI_STATE_S3' undeclared (first use in this function) ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in CC net/dccp/qpolicy.o cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o] Error 1
Thanks for the report, we'll fix it. Can anyone explain why include/linux/acpi_bus.h has #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and conditional build for a dummy inline version of acpi_target_system_state(), *but* that does not get included or used if CONFIG_ACPI=n? Additionally, the combination of CONFIG_ACPI=y and CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n does not seem to work at all. So we'll really have to sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI all over, instead of neatly using the dummy versions that someone has gone through the trouble of adding? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center