Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 6 authors, 2014-07-07

Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)

From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2014-06-24 11:43:39
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, lkml

On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:
On 06/18/14 23:16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

The powerpc allyesconfig is again broken more than usual.

Changes since 20140618:
on i386:

CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled.

  CC      drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c: In function 'i915_drm_freeze':
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'acpi_target_system_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: error: 'ACPI_STATE_S3' undeclared (first use in this function)
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:547:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  CC      net/dccp/qpolicy.o
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.o] Error 1
Thanks for the report, we'll fix it.

Can anyone explain why include/linux/acpi_bus.h has #ifdef
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP and conditional build for a dummy inline version of
acpi_target_system_state(), *but* that does not get included or used if
CONFIG_ACPI=n? Additionally, the combination of CONFIG_ACPI=y and
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n does not seem to work at all.

So we'll really have to sprinkle #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI all over, instead of
neatly using the dummy versions that someone has gone through the
trouble of adding?

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help