Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with Linus' tree
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2013-03-19 21:12:39
Also in:
lkml
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2013-03-19 21:12:39
Also in:
lkml
Hey, Stephen. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 01:19:38PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
@@@ -456,40 -462,30 +462,30 @@@ static int worker_pool_assign_id(struc
{
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
- ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret >= 0)
- pool->id = ret;
- mutex_unlock(&worker_pool_idr_mutex);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq_mutex);
+
+ do {
- if (!idr_pre_get(&worker_pool_idr, GFP_KERNEL))
- return -ENOMEM;
- ret = idr_get_new(&worker_pool_idr, pool, &pool->id);
++ ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
++ if (ret >= 0)
++ pool->id = ret;
+ } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
- return ret;
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
We don't need the loop anymore, so it should look like
static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_mutex);
ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (ret >= 0) {
pool->id = ret;
return 0;
}
return ret;
}
Anyways, I pulled master into wq/for-next and resolved it there, so it
shouldn't cause you any more trouble.
Thanks!
--
tejun