Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 6 authors, 2013-01-23

Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2013-01-22 23:50:41
Also in: linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Mon 21-01-13 18:11:30, Ted Tso wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:04:32AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
quoted
Beyond the FUSE/LOOP fun, will you apply this patch to your linux-next GIT tree?

Feel free to add...

     Tested-by: Sedat Dilek [off-list ref]

A similiar patch for JBD went through your tree into mainline (see [1] and [2]).
I'm not at all convinced that this patch has anything to do with your
problem.  I don't see how it could affect things, and I believe you
mentioned that you saw the problem even with this patch applied?  (I'm
not sure; some of your messages which you sent were hard to
understand, and you mentioned something about trying to send messages
when low on sleep :-).

In any case, the reason why I haven't pulled this patch into the ext4
tree is because I was waiting for Eric and some of the performance
team folks at Red Hat to supply some additional information about why
this commit was making a difference in performance for a particular
proprietary, closed source benchmark.
  Just a small correction - it was aim7 AFAIK which isn't closed source
(anymore). You can download it from SourceForge
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/Initial%20release/).
Now I have some reservations about what the benchmark does but historically
it has found quite a few issues for us as well.
I'm very suspicious about applying patches under the "cargo cult"
school of programming.  ("We don't understand why it makes a
difference, but it seems to be good, so bombs away!" :-)
  Well, neither am I ;) But it is obvious the patch speeds up
log_start_commit() by 'a bit' (taking spinlock, disabling irqs, ...). And
apparently 'a bit' is noticeable for particular workload on a particular
machine - commit statistics Eric provided showed that clearly. I'd still be
happier if Eric also told us how much log_start_commit() calls there were
so that one could verify that 'a bit' could indeed multiply to a measurable
difference. But given how simple the patch is, I gave away after a while
and just merged it...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help