Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-17 03:14:16
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-17 03:14:16
Also in:
lkml
Hi Chris, On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:52:41 -0500 Chris Mason [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:15:04PM -0700, Chris Mason wrote:quoted
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:00:22PM -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Josef and I have sob on all of our commits (at least all the ones not in 3.7, I didn't go back farther). In this case the Author was Stefan and it ended up rebased in either Josef's or my tree. We usually try to preserve merges on rebase, but this time was a bigger set of changes than usual and it didn't work out.Just FYI, I've pushed out a fixed version of the tree with proper signed-off-by on all the commits, thanks for catching that. It also has the fix for the ppc compile problems. (This isn't a pull request yet, I've got the hash collision fix and a few others pending as well).
You do realise that I just fetch your tree/branch each day, right? So it will be in tomorrow's linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au