[PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-12-06 13:21:51
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
led subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Lee Jones, Pavel Machek, Linus Torvalds
During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests were done and this problem was found. It turned out that the released register documentation is wrong. The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one. Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com> --- drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index c464682..676e729 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = { { .name = "led_1", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(7), + .mask = BIT(6), }, { .name = "led_2", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(6), + .mask = BIT(5), }, { .name = "led_3", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(5), + .mask = BIT(4), }, { .name = "led_4", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(4), + .mask = BIT(3), }, { .name = "led_5", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(3), + .mask = BIT(2), }, { .name = "led_6", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(2), + .mask = BIT(1), }, { .name = "led_7", .port = 0x49, - .mask = BIT(1), + .mask = BIT(0), } };
--
1.7.10.4