Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2013-01-12

Re: Request for tree inclusion

From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-02 23:59:11
Also in: lkml

2012/12/2 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref]:
Well, these are a bit late (I expected Linus to release v3.7 today), but
since Ingo has not piped in over the weekend, I have added them from today
after the tip tree merge.
Yeah sorry to submit that so late. Those branches are in pending pull
requests to the -tip tree and I thought about relying on the
propagation of -tip into -next as usual. But Ingo has been very busy
with numa related work during this cycle. So until these branches get
merged in -tip, I'm short-circuiting a bit the -next step before it
becomes too late for the next merge window.
I have called them fw-cputime, fs-sched and fw-nohz respectively and
listed you as the only contact in case of problems.
Ok.
If these are to be
long term trees included in linux-next, I would prefer that you use
better branch names - otherwise, if they are just short term, please tell
me to remove them when they are finished with.
They are definitely short term. I'll tell you once these can be dropped.

Thanks a lot!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help