On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:55:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:37:42 -0800 Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while you're
away.  That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will make it easier
for others to integrate and test the four(!) different
autoschednumacore implementations on top of linux-next.

Pretty please?

So, your understanding is that the "old sched/numa code" won't (and
shouldn't) be merged into Linus' tree (for v3.7, or ever)?

In that case, what I can do is give you a tree that is the same as
akpm-base but with one of the merges in the tip tree reverted (and, in
fact, I could push that into akpm-base to make things easier for you).
I guess that would be the merge of the numa/core branch which would
result in the following commits being reverted:

Ok, ignore all this :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au