David and Stephen,

I apologize for not taking the necessary steps to verify our patches
before submission. Ignorance is not an excuse... Anyways David thank you
for fixing the issue for us.

Jay-

-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 6:48 PM
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-next@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Vipul Pandya; Jay Hernandez
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:06:15 +1000

Actually, for me it is.  I have a script that does the "use 
yesterday's version" for me.  To fix (even a one liner) means bringing

up an editor, commiting, creating the patch and then recommiting it 
(an implementation
detail) and recording that I need to keep (automatically) applying the

patch in case the maintainer doesn't react quickly.

Ok, fair enough.

I'll try to look into making x86 barf when a vmalloc.h include is
missing.