Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-30

Re: [-next]: s390 *_irq() link errors

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2012-09-30 09:35:44
Also in: linux-s390, lkml

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:08:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Jean Delvare [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I thought we were trying to move away from explicit arch exclusions,
but if S390 is special then fine with me. I've folded Heiko's fix into
"depends on GENERIC_HARDIRQS" is the alternative...
That would make even less sense to me, I2C can work just fine without
IRQs.
For the individual drivers that need it...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help