Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2012-09-25

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-25 11:45:05
Also in: lkml

On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Rafael,

After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'transition_frequency_pstate':
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:991:19: error: 'HW_PSTATE_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:991:19: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:992:19: error: 'struct powernow_k8_data' has no member named 'max_hw_pstate'
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:995:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_khz_freq_from_pstate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:996:8: error: 'struct powernow_k8_data' has no member named 'currpstate'
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1004:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'transition_pstate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: At top level:
drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:981:12: warning: 'transition_frequency_pstate' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]

The code causing this was removed by commit e1f0b8e9b04a ("cpufreq:
Remove support for hardware P-state chips from powernow-k8") but
reintroduced (presumably incorrectly) by commit d20801be3c11 ("Merge
branch 'master' into linux-next").

I have used the pm tree from next-20120924 for today.
It looks like I got the merge wrong.  Sorry about that, I'll fix it up later
today.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help