Re: [PATCH] net: don't allow INET to be not configured

linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 · Stephen Rothwell <hidden> · 2012-09-04
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 (uml + execve) · Randy Dunlap <hidden> · 2012-09-04
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 (netdev) · Randy Dunlap <hidden> · 2012-09-04
[PATCH] net: don't allow INET to be not configured · Stephen Hemminger <hidden> · 2012-09-04
Re: [PATCH] net: don't allow INET to be not configured · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2012-09-04
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 (cma) · Randy Dunlap <hidden> · 2012-09-04
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 (drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c) · Randy Dunlap <hidden> · 2012-09-04
Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 4 (drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-mmioreg.c) · Timur Tabi <hidden> · 2012-09-07

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2012-09-04 18:07:07
Also in: lkml, netdev

From: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:44:51 -0700

There is no reason to expose turning off TCP/IP networking.
If networking is enabled force TCP/IP to enabled. This also
eliminates the time chasing down errors with bogus configurations
generated by 'make randconfig'

For testing, it is still possible to edit Kconfig

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <redacted>

People have legitimate reasons to enable NET without INET, so let's
just fix the dependency bugs as they are reported.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help