Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-03 11:06:53
Also in:
lkml
On Tuesday 03 July 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:
Show Details On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:59:11AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Tuesday 03 July 2012, Thierry Reding wrote:quoted
I came up with the attached patch. What do you think? It fixes the PowerPC allyesconfig issue for me.This one looks correct, but I would still do it the other way around, putting the depends statements into the locations of the other drivers. The main difference is that we can then independently convert the remaining drivers, without having merge conflicts in the same line every time we remove one of the dependencies.The downside of that approach, however, is to make PWM override other settings. For instance if you have TWL6030_PWM selected and then decide to also select PWM, then the former will be automatically deselected to satisfy the dependency. I'm not sure if that's desired.
It's true that this may be confusing, but I think it's the right approach for future multiplatform kernels. If we have e.g. a combined omap+ux500+imx kernel, we can only have one implementation of the PWM interfaces, and that should be the new one. It's less clear for the other architectures. Maybe a mixed approach is better there, making CONFIG_PWM depend on !MACH_JZ4740 && !PUV3_NB0916 && !BLACKFIN, but letting the remaining ARM versions of the PWM code depend on !PWM. Arnd