On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 12:45 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi Artem,

On Tue, 29 May 2012 12:33:01 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This tree (l2-mtd) needs to be updated since most of its patches (but not
commits) have been merged into upstream trees.  Artem, you and Dave
Woodhouse need to discuss your work flow.  (Or I just need to remove the
l2-mtd tree from linux-next.)

I fact, I screwed up the various merge resolutions that the above mess
caused, so I just dropped the l2-mtd tree for today.  Please fix it up.

That is generally the intention. As discussed when we added the l2-mtd
tree to linux-next, it is operating as my 'patchwork' with Artem's
initial review. So dropping it when it conflicts with the main tree is
what we would expect.

I actually rounded everything up from Artem's tree 2 weeks ago, and
committed it with minor fixes and one rejected patch. Unfortunately,
when 'git push' told me "Everything up-to-date" it was lying, so that
didn't make it onto the *server* until yesterday when I noticed;
apologies for that.

-- 
dwmw2