Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-03-13
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Siddhesh Poyarekar <hidden> · 2012-03-14
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Siddhesh Poyarekar <hidden> · 2012-03-20
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Paul Gortmaker <hidden> · 2012-03-25
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Siddhesh Poyarekar <hidden> · 2012-03-26
Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps · Stephen Rothwell <hidden> · 2012-03-26

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-20 13:38:44
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Morton
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:04:36 +0530
Siddhesh Poyarekar [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Following is the updated patch with requested changes incorporated.

Boy, that's a lot of changes (below).  What does it all do?

Hi,

Since this patch was included in the -mm tree on March 14th, I assumed
that linux-next would get the patch in today's merge, but it hasn't.
Is there something I am missing? Does the patch need additional
review/acks that I need to request for?

Thanks,
Siddhesh

Thanks,
Siddhesh


-- 
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help