Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 17 (uml)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2012-02-17 21:32:44
Also in:
linux-um, lkml
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 19:34, Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] wrote:
On 02/16/2012 09:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:quoted
Changes since 20120216:uml on x86_64 (defconfig): CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from linux-next-20120217/include/linux/slab.h:12:0, from linux-next-20120217/include/linux/crypto.h:23, from linux-next-20120217/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:4, from linux-next-20120217/arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: linux-next-20120217/include/linux/gfp.h: In function 'gfp_zonelist': linux-next-20120217/include/linux/gfp.h:267:1: error: '__enabled_CONFIG_NUMA' undeclared (first use in this function) linux-next-20120217/include/linux/gfp.h:267:1: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in linux-next-20120217/include/linux/gfp.h:267:1: error: '__enabled_CONFIG_NUMA_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function)
That's due to the lack of CONFIG_NUMA in various archs (also m68k).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds