Re: [Patch] numa: introduce CONFIG_NUMA_SYSFS for drivers/base/node.c
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2011-08-25 20:57:25
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2011-08-25 20:57:25
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Cong Wang wrote:
quoted
No, it doesn't work, CONFIG_HUGETLBFS can be enabled with CONFIG_NUMA=y and CONFIG_SYSFS=n and that uses data structures from drivers/base/node.c which doesn't get compiled with this patch.So, you mean with CONFIG_NUMA=y && CONFIG_SYSFS=n && CONFIG_HUGETLBFS=y we still get compile error? Which data structures are used by hugetlbfs?
node_states[], which is revealed at link time if you tried to compile your patch. It's obvious that we don't want to add per-node hugetlbfs attributes to sysfs directories if sysfs is disabled, so you need to modify the hugetlbfs code as well. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>