Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2011-09-14

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2011-08-25 18:27:10
Also in: lkml, xen-devel

On 08/25/2011 11:13 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 08/24/2011 09:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
quoted
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h between a series of commits from the tip
tree and a smaller series of similar commits from the xen tree.

I see that Linus is commenting on these patches at the moment, and its
not easy to resolve the conflicts, so I will just use the xen tree from
next-20110824 for today.
Thanks Stephen; the xen tree ones are more current, and I want to make
sure I didn't screw up any of the cmpxchg/xadd changes in a wider test env.
Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
should be dropped.

	-hpa
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help