Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 24
From: Arnaud Lacombe <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-25 04:31:16
Also in:
lkml
Hi, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi all, The powerpc allyesconfig build still fails today. Changes since 20110823: New tree: kvmtool The security tree lost its build failure. The ptrace tree gained a build failure (yeaterday) for which I have reveretd a commit. The tty tree gained a build failure so I used the version from next-20110823. The staging tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree and a build failure for which I reverted a commit. The moduleh tree gained a conflict against the staging tree.Quickly testing a new configuration blows up on the following: console [ttyS0] enabled Fast TSC calibration failed TSC: Unable to calibrate against PIT TSC: No reference (HPET/PMTIMER) available Marking TSC unstable due to could not calculate TSC khz Calibrating delay loop... 154.88 BogoMIPS (lpj=77440) pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: Intel QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.13.0 stepping 03 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 827bf688 IP: [<c13945e2>] apply_alternatives+0xc3/0x18a *pde = 00000000 Oops: 0000 [#1] DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.0-rc3-next-20110824+ #5 Bochs Bochs EIP: 0060:[<c13945e2>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 EIP is at apply_alternatives+0xc3/0x18a EAX: ffffffff EBX: c13df690 ECX: 00000005 EDX: 827bf688 ESI: 827bf688 EDI: c1367e9e EBP: c1367fa8 ESP: c1367e70 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=c1366000 task=c136c340 task.ti=c1366000) Stack: 00000002 c137b700 c1142ac0 00000dc6 c1367e9e 8268a422 00000005 827bf688 c13dffd8 c1367e05 05000086 f6890046 00f69000 c1367eb0 00000086 00000000 00000046 c1367ec0 00000046 00000000 c1367edc c101f3cc 00000dd3 00000000 Call Trace: [<c1142ac0>] ? serial8250_start_tx+0xe0/0xe0 [<c101f3cc>] ? console_unlock+0x10c/0x150 [<c12ab669>] ? common_interrupt+0x29/0x30 [<c1023c64>] ? irq_exit+0x54/0x90 [<c1003a93>] ? do_IRQ+0x43/0xa0 [<c12ab669>] ? common_interrupt+0x29/0x30 [<c13954a8>] ? check_fpu+0xae/0xdc [<c13946c0>] alternative_instructions+0x17/0x32 [<c1395567>] check_bugs+0x91/0x93 [<c138f6bb>] start_kernel+0x28e/0x299 [<c138f1b7>] ? loglevel+0x1a/0x1a [<c138f0b3>] i386_start_kernel+0xb3/0xbb Code: ec fe ff ff 8d 0c 0b 89 8d dc fe ff ff 8d 54 13 04 8b bd d8 fe ff ff 89 95 e4 fe ff ff 89 b5 e0 fe ff ff 8b 8d e0 fe ff ff 89 d6 <f3> a4 80 bd f6 fe ff ff e8 75 17 80 bd ec fe ff ff 05 75 0e 89 EIP: [<c13945e2>] apply_alternatives+0xc3/0x18a SS:ESP 0068:c1367e70 CR2: 00000000827bf688 ---[ end trace 4eaa2a86a8e2da22 ]--- .config attached. I'll try to bisect it.
ok, this is a regression in 3.1, continuing bisection... - Arnaud