Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-07-22

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with the vfs tree

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: 2011-07-22 08:41:28
Also in: lkml

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the security-testing tree got a conflict in
security/tomoyo/realpath.c between commit 6ef0dd885ce8 ("get rid of
pointless checks for dentry->sb == NULL") from the vfs tree and commit
5625f2e32663 ("TOMOYO: Change pathname for non-rename()able filesystems")
from the security-testing tree.

The latter includes the change from the former, so I just used the latter.
Thank you.
Modification of security/tomoyo/realpath.c in 6ef0dd885ce8 is no longer needed.

In message "linux-next: Tree for July 22",
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
The security-testing tree still has its build failure.
(...snipped...)
Merging security-testing/next
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in security/tomoyo/realpath.c
What should I do?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help