On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:22:26 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Hi Jean,

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:32:28 +0100 Jean Delvare [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Stephen, sorry for the inconvenience, both Hans and myself build-tested
the new code on an architecture where <linux/delay.h> gets included
implicitly, so we didn't notice it was missing.

It happens.  It seems that delay.h is almost always the one that is
forgotten.  X86 builds include it implicitly but powerpc doesn't.

I wonder if we could concoct a nice checkpatch test for it.

Would certainly be a good idea, yes. Probably not trivial though.

-- 
Jean Delvare