Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31

linux-next: Tree for January 31 · Stephen Rothwell <hidden> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 · Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) · Randy Dunlap <hidden> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) · Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) · Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) · David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> · 2011-01-31
Re: linux-next: Tree for January 31 (ip_vs) · Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> · 2011-02-01

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-31 18:25:39
Also in: lkml

On 01/31/2011 09:05 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:41:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

Changes since 20110121:

New tree: unicore32

Renamed tree: swiotlb-xen to xen-two

Sweet. Thank you.

quoted

Dropped tree: xen

Uh, why? Jeremy's tree should be OK now? Did something not
compile correctly?

No, keep it dropped for now.  I'll do a proper linux-next branch shortly.

    J