Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2010-08-30

Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35

From: <hidden>
Date: 2010-08-30 15:11:12
Also in: kexec, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

----- "Tejun Heo" [off-list ref] wrote:
On 08/30/2010 04:51 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
quoted
kintegrityd   R  running task        0    13      2 0x00000008
 ffffffffffffff10 ffffffff81078e25 0000000000000010
0000000000000206
quoted
 ffff88046dcf1e40 0000000000000018 ffff88046dc9a440
ffff88046dc9a440
quoted
 ffff88088e231f00 ffff88088e239300 ffff88046dcf1ee0
ffffffff810796e8
quoted
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81078e25>] ? worker_maybe_bind_and_lock+0x55/0xf0
 [<ffffffff810796e8>] ? rescuer_thread+0x108/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff810795e0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x0/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff810795e0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x0/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff8107fc06>] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8100be84>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff8107fb70>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8100be80>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
...
quoted
runnable tasks:
            task   PID         tree-key  switches  prio    
exec-runtime         sum-exec        sum-sleep
quoted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quoted
         swapper     1       296.512617        23   120      
296.512617       282.090606         0.046441 /
quoted
     sync_supers    11       293.512617         2   120      
293.512617         0.002502      5354.887736 /
quoted
R    kintegrityd    13      2382.377879         1   100     
2382.377879    180846.751167         0.001076 /

Looks like kintegrityd went bonkers.  Maybe it has some busy wait
which doesn't quite work well with how cmwq schedules works.  I'll
look into it.  Can you please attach your .config?
Attached.
Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help