Hi Rusty,

On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:22:29 +1030 Rusty Russell [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:05:28 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c: In function 'powernowk8_target':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: error: implicit declaration of function 'tsk_cpumask'
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c:1139: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_copy' makes pointer from integer without a cast
include/linux/cpumask.h:466: note: expected 'const struct cpumask *' but argument is of type 'int'

Caused by commit 9dd4c5ab546fcac98cfb9ca24ed5cc1bf7f08334
("cpumask:tsk_cpus_allowed-not-tsk_cpumask") from the rr tree interacting
with commit b8cbe7e82ec8b55d7bbdde66fc69e788fde00dc6 ("[CPUFREQ] cpumask:
don't put a cpumask on the stack in x86...cpufreq/powernow-k8.c") from
the cpufreq tree.

The cpufreq patch above is now in Linus' tree, so You should add the
patch below to your tree (or squash it into the affected patch).

Thanks, done and rebased.

But not exported/uploaded ... :-(
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/