Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with the arm tree
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: 2009-08-20 11:20:16
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: 2009-08-20 11:20:16
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
* Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] [090819 08:04]:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c between commit
085b54d99b8ee999e7905b8f16e201e0da8ba369 ("ARM: OMAP4: Add UART4
support") from the arm tree and commit
4c29fa3e47342666e12e46f35f40dd90b12cd1a4 ("OMAP: remove OMAP_TAG_UART")
from the omap tree.
Just context changes (I think). I fixed it up (see below) and can carry
the fix as necessary.Thanks yeh the fix looks right. I'll take a look if I can squeeze something like that into my queue so the merge conflict disappears. Regards, Tony
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au diff --cc arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c index 1b22307,646079f..0000000--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c@@@ -38,8 -38,8 +38,8 @@@ static struct platform_device *sdp4430_ &sdp4430_lcd_device, }; - static struct omap_uart_config sdp4430_uart_config __initdata = { + static struct omap_uart_platform_data sdp4430_uart_config __initdata = { - .enabled_uarts = (1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2), + .enabled_uarts = (1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2) | (1 << 3), }; static struct omap_lcd_config sdp4430_lcd_config __initdata = {