Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2008-12-29 15:04:48
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: 2008-12-29 15:04:48
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next, and then they won't apply to mainline. Or that linux-next will not apply on top of those patches. Mainly memory management.
Significant rework to many many patches? The FS-Cache patches don't have all that much impact outside of their own directories, AFS and NFS.
Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1. Guys, this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/27/173
Okay, that's a reasonable request. David