Re: linux-next: Tree for September 2
From: Joerg Roedel <hidden>
Date: 2008-09-03 07:06:30
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:30:11AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:02:07 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi all, Changes since next-20080901: The x86 tree gained a conflict against the dwmw2 tree for which I reverted a commit from the dwmw2 tree. The sound tree lost its conflict. The block tree gained a conflict against the device-mapper tree but lost its build fix patch. The ttydev tree lost a conflict but gained a build fix patch. I have also applied the following patches for known problems: ftrace: protect the definition of ftrace_release revert BUILD_BUG_ON change Revert "debug: add notifier chain debugging" debug: add notifier chain debugging (different version) sparc: qlogicpti fallout from sbus removal powerpc: make sure all kernel test is before _etextFrom patch (not tested yet), it seems dma_alloc_coherent() on x86_64 is still broken as I reported to August 29's linux-next. It easily goes down to swiotlb routine, which uses __GFP_DMA, and show "page allocation failure" at boot. Old code used __GFP_DMA32 as much as possible, I think.
Hmm, SWIOTLB unconditionally allocates from the DMA zone. Thats bad but should be easy to change. I prepare a patch.
Just a notification.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Joerg
--
| AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
| General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy