Hi Russell,

Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c: In function
'ucb1400_ts_detect_irq': drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c:333: error:
'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function)

I applied the following patch.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

From 3a6383e5556524c941c1421a0e65a0725189ac9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:49:30 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] ucb1400: restore NO_IRQ definition

This piece of code was removed by commit
2881353061f896c3894c64e39cf2be35b36aa9fc ("[ARM] 5184/1: Split ucb1400_ts
into core and touchscreen").

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <redacted>
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c |    4 ++++
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c

b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c index 006499b..5498662 100644

--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ucb1400_ts.c

@@ -289,6 +289,10 @@ static void ucb1400_ts_close(struct input_dev *idev)
 	ucb1400_reg_write(ucb->ac97, UCB_TS_CR, 0);
 }

+#ifndef NO_IRQ
+#define NO_IRQ	0
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Try to probe our interrupt, rather than relying on lots of
  * hard-coded machine dependencies.