Re: [PATCH v3] module: Rename EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES
flat view
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-07-22 08:26:50
Also in:
linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-kbuild, lkml
On 21/07/2025 12.40, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 7/15/25 20:58, Daniel Gomez wrote:quoted
On 15/07/2025 10.43, Vlastimil Babka wrote:quoted
Christoph suggested that the explicit _GPL_ can be dropped from the module namespace export macro, as it's intended for in-tree modules only. It would be possible to restrict it technically, but it was pointed out [2] that some cases of using an out-of-tree build of an in-tree module with the same name are legitimate. But in that case those also have to be GPL anyway so it's unnecessary to spell it out in the macro name. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aFleJN_fE-RbSoFD@infradead.org/ (local) [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNATRkZHwJGpojCnvdiaoDnP%2BaeUXgdey5sb_8muzdWTMkA@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [2] Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Shivank Garg <redacted> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <redacted> Acked-by: Nicolas Schier <redacted> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gomez <redacted> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <redacted> --- Daniel, please clarify if you'll take this via module tree or Christian can take it via vfs tree?Patch 707f853d7fa3 ("module: Provide EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES() helper") from Peter was merged through Masahiro in v6.16-rc1. Since this is a related fix/rename/cleanup, it'd make sense for it to go through his kbuild tree as well. Masahiro, please let me know if you'd prefer otherwise. If not, I'll queue it up in the modules tree.Maybe with no reply, you can queue it then?
+ Jiri, Stephen and Greg, added to the To: list. EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL_FOR_MODULES macro was merged [1] through Masahiro's pull request in v6.16-rc1. This patch from Vlastimil renames the macro to EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_MODULES. This means Jiri's patch b20d6576cdb3 "serial: 8250: export RSA functions" will need to be updated accordingly. I'd like like to know how you prefer to proceed, since it was requested to have this merged as a fix before Linus releases a new kernel with the former name. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK7LNAQunzxOHR+vMZLf8kqxyRtLx-Z2G2VZquJmndrT9TZjiQ@mail.gmail.com/ (local) [1] Masahiro, just a heads-up that I plan to merge this through the linux-modules tree unless you advise otherwise.