Re: [PATCH v3 05/35] mm: introduce slabobj_ext to support slab object extensions
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2024-02-14 17:59:09
Also in:
cgroups, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml
On 2/12/24 22:38, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
Currently slab pages can store only vectors of obj_cgroup pointers in page->memcg_data. Introduce slabobj_ext structure to allow more data to be stored for each slab object. Wrap obj_cgroup into slabobj_ext to support current functionality while allowing to extend slabobj_ext in the future. Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
...
+static inline bool need_slab_obj_ext(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM creates vector of obj_cgroup objects conditionally
+ * inside memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook. No other users for now.
+ */
+ return false;
+}
+
+static inline struct slabobj_ext *
+prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, void *p)
+{
+ struct slab *slab;
+
+ if (!p)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!need_slab_obj_ext())
+ return NULL;
+
+ slab = virt_to_slab(p);
+ if (!slab_obj_exts(slab) &&
+ WARN(alloc_slab_obj_exts(slab, s, flags, false),
+ "%s, %s: Failed to create slab extension vector!\n",
+ __func__, s->name))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return slab_obj_exts(slab) + obj_to_index(s, slab, p);This is called in slab_post_alloc_hook() and the result stored to obj_exts but unused. Maybe introduce this only in a later patch where it becomes relevant?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c@@ -201,6 +201,54 @@ struct kmem_cache *find_mergeable(unsigned int size, unsigned int align, return NULL; } +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT +/* + * The allocated objcg pointers array is not accounted directly. + * Moreover, it should not come from DMA buffer and is not readily + * reclaimable. So those GFP bits should be masked off. + */ +#define OBJCGS_CLEAR_MASK (__GFP_DMA | __GFP_RECLAIMABLE | \ + __GFP_ACCOUNT | __GFP_NOFAIL) + +int alloc_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab, struct kmem_cache *s, + gfp_t gfp, bool new_slab)
Since you're moving this function between files anyway, could you please instead move it to mm/slub.c. I expect we'll eventually (maybe even soon) move the rest of performance sensitive kmemcg hooks there as well to make inlining possible.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+{ + unsigned int objects = objs_per_slab(s, slab); + unsigned long obj_exts; + void *vec; + + gfp &= ~OBJCGS_CLEAR_MASK; + vec = kcalloc_node(objects, sizeof(struct slabobj_ext), gfp, + slab_nid(slab)); + if (!vec) + return -ENOMEM; + + obj_exts = (unsigned long)vec; +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG + obj_exts |= MEMCG_DATA_OBJEXTS; +#endif + if (new_slab) { + /* + * If the slab is brand new and nobody can yet access its + * obj_exts, no synchronization is required and obj_exts can + * be simply assigned. + */ + slab->obj_exts = obj_exts; + } else if (cmpxchg(&slab->obj_exts, 0, obj_exts)) { + /* + * If the slab is already in use, somebody can allocate and + * assign slabobj_exts in parallel. In this case the existing + * objcg vector should be reused. + */ + kfree(vec); + return 0; + } + + kmemleak_not_leak(vec); + return 0; +} +#endif /* CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT */ + static struct kmem_cache *create_cache(const char *name, unsigned int object_size, unsigned int align, slab_flags_t flags, unsigned int useroffset,diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 2ef88bbf56a3..1eb1050814aa 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c@@ -683,10 +683,10 @@ static inline bool __slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *sla if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) { ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old, - freelist_new, counters_new); + freelist_new, counters_new); } else { ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old, - freelist_new, counters_new); + freelist_new, counters_new); } if (likely(ret)) return true;@@ -710,13 +710,13 @@ static inline bool slab_update_freelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, if (s->flags & __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE) { ret = __update_freelist_fast(slab, freelist_old, counters_old, - freelist_new, counters_new); + freelist_new, counters_new); } else { unsigned long flags; local_irq_save(flags); ret = __update_freelist_slow(slab, freelist_old, counters_old, - freelist_new, counters_new); + freelist_new, counters_new);
I can see the mixing of tabs and spaces is wrong but perhaps not fix it as part of the series?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
local_irq_restore(flags); } if (likely(ret))@@ -1881,13 +1881,25 @@ static inline enum node_stat_item cache_vmstat_idx(struct kmem_cache *s) NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B : NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE_B; } -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM -static inline void memcg_free_slab_cgroups(struct slab *slab) +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_OBJ_EXT +static inline void free_slab_obj_exts(struct slab *slab)
Right, freeing is already here, so makes sense put the allocation here as well.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -3817,6 +3820,7 @@ void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, struct obj_cgroup *objcg, kmemleak_alloc_recursive(p[i], s->object_size, 1, s->flags, init_flags); kmsan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], init_flags); + obj_exts = prepare_slab_obj_exts_hook(s, flags, p[i]);
Yeah here's the hook used. Doesn't it generate a compiler warning? Maybe at least postpone the call until the result is further used.
} memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook(s, objcg, flags, size, p);