Thread (208 messages) 208 messages, 21 authors, 2024-02-29

Re: [PATCH v3 00/35] Memory allocation profiling

From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: 2024-02-13 12:24:18
Also in: cgroups, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, linux-mm, lkml

On Mon 12-02-24 13:38:46, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
[...]
We're aiming to get this in the next merge window, for 6.9. The feedback
we've gotten has been that even out of tree this patchset has already
been useful, and there's a significant amount of other work gated on the
code tagging functionality included in this patchset [2].
I suspect it will not come as a surprise that I really dislike the
implementation proposed here. I will not repeat my arguments, I have
done so on several occasions already. 

Anyway, I didn't go as far as to nak it even though I _strongly_ believe
this debugging feature will add a maintenance overhead for a very long
time. I can live with all the downsides of the proposed implementation
_as long as_ there is a wider agreement from the MM community as this is
where the maintenance cost will be payed. So far I have not seen (m)any
acks by MM developers so aiming into the next merge window is more than
little rushed. 
 81 files changed, 2126 insertions(+), 695 deletions(-)
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help