Hey Nick,
FYI $subject seems wrong, this is a PCI patch AFAICT.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:47:49PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without
Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations
are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro
in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing
object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe
might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message.
So comment out all uses of MODULE_LICENSE that are not in real modules
This patch should not been needed, there's an existing patch to make
this a module:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230111125323.1911373-4-daire.mcnamara@microchip.com/ (local)
(the license declaration is left in as documentation).
I don't really get this one though, why leave it there as
"documentation" when the file has an SPDX entry anyway?
Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock <redacted>
Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
One for the future:
How about also CCing those listed in MAINTAINERS for the file you're
changing?
Cheers,
Conor.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
index 0ebf7015e9af..08c0b778ce67 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
@@ -1135,6 +1135,6 @@ static struct platform_driver mc_pcie_driver = {
};
builtin_platform_driver(mc_pcie_driver);
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+/* MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); */
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Microchip PCIe host controller driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>");--
2.39.1.268.g9de2f9a303